DTC brand with 600 tickets a day
Support queue
Triage and reply drafts helped the team answer faster without hiring another support cohort.
Pick one repetitive workflow. We build the automation into your real tools, keep humans in control, and prove whether it saves time before you commit to anything bigger.
$10k flat · One workflow · Senior engineer, hands-on
What we build
We find a repetitive process your team already does every week, build the automation around your real tools, and measure whether it saves time before expanding to the next one.
Classify messages, draft replies, route urgent issues, and keep the human approval step where quality matters.
Answer calls, qualify leads, book appointments, collect details, and write clean notes back into your systems.
Research accounts, enrich records, draft follow-ups, score leads, and reduce the busywork around the next conversation.
Give teams one place to ask questions across docs, Slack, drives, and SOPs with grounded answers and source links.
Pull data from spreadsheets and business tools, flag exceptions, draft summaries, and keep recurring reports moving.
Not sure what to automate first? Bring the messy workflow. We will tell you what is worth building, what is not, and where the first hour savings should come from.
Book an automation auditThe honest comparison
Tap gives you a senior engineer who can find the workflow, build the automation, and keep it working without turning one project into a permanent hire or a consulting program.
Start with one workflow, ship the first automation in weeks, stay month-to-month, and expand only when the numbers justify it.
A good AI engineer is expensive, hard to evaluate, and still needs months to learn your business before shipping useful automations.
Large firms turn a single workflow into discovery, strategy, steering committees, and a statement of work before anything reaches production.
Zapier, n8n, and AI tools are useful, but someone still has to design the workflow, debug failures, handle edge cases, and keep it running.
Outcomes
The exact workflow changes by company. The pattern is the same: remove repetitive work, keep humans in control, and measure the time saved.
DTC brand with 600 tickets a day
Triage and reply drafts helped the team answer faster without hiring another support cohort.
Professional services team
A knowledge copilot drafted proposals from past work so senior people spent time reviewing, not rewriting.
Manufacturing back office
Reconciliation, exception flags, and draft reports cut down the manual work around month-end close.
How it works
No giant transformation plan. We choose one process, ship the automation, and use the results to decide what comes next.
We look at where time is leaking and choose one workflow that is worth automating first.
We connect it to your real tools, add the AI where it helps, and keep review steps where judgment matters.
We monitor quality, fix edge cases, and decide whether to expand, adjust, or move to the next workflow.
Pricing
Start with one workflow and one clear outcome. If it works, keep shipping month-to-month. If it does not, you are not locked into a retainer.
One painful workflow turned into a working automation.
After launch
Continue month-to-month for maintenance, tuning, and new automations. The sprint makes the buying decision smaller: prove one workflow first, then decide what comes next.
Who we work with
If the work happens in inboxes, docs, CRMs, spreadsheets, support tools, or calls, there is usually a good first automation to build.
Consulting, legal, agencies, and expert teams that spend too much time drafting, searching, and reporting.
Proposals, client reports, knowledge search
Companies with inboxes, tickets, calls, and intake queues that need faster response without losing quality.
Triage, reply drafts, voice agents
Teams buried in research, enrichment, handoffs, follow-ups, and repetitive coordination work.
Lead research, CRM updates, follow-ups
Finance, admin, and reporting workflows where people copy data between systems and chase exceptions.
Invoices, collections, reporting
Model choice
Some workflows need speed. Some need long context. Some need low cost or private deployment. We test against your real examples and choose based on evidence, not brand loyalty.
OpenAI, Claude, Gemini, Llama, and others when the workflow calls for them.
Aman Meghrajani
Founder & Principal Engineer
A note from the founder
Tap is built around the opposite approach: one painful workflow, real tools, clear human review, and numbers we can measure.
You work directly with a senior engineer. No junior handoff, no model resale agenda, no six-month strategy deck before anything ships.
If you have a workflow eating your team's week, I would like to see it. Book the audit. Thirty minutes. No slide deck.
Questions
A workflow audit, one production automation, integrations into your tools, prompt and model tuning, scoped access, human review points, and a results readout.
Hiring is slower and more permanent. Tap gives you senior implementation help now, without recruiting, onboarding, payroll, or long-term commitment.
For simple triggers, yes. We help when the workflow needs language, judgment, data lookup, integrations, edge-case handling, or human review.
We define the success metric before building. If the audit does not find a workflow worth automating, we say so instead of forcing a project.
We use scoped access, document the data flow, keep approvals with your team, and avoid sending sensitive data anywhere it does not need to go.
Usually within one week. The sprint is designed to ship a useful production automation in roughly four weeks, depending on access and workflow complexity.
Next step
Bring the repetitive process your team keeps doing manually. We will audit it, scope the sprint, and tell you whether it is worth automating before you spend more.
$10k flat sprint. One workflow. Senior engineer, hands-on.